E-ISSN: 2695-1886
P-ISSN: 3517-9252
DOI: https://iigdpublishers.com/article/1091
In occidental culture, the dismissive treatment reserved for the imagination coincides with the implementation of a theory of knowledge based exclusively on understanding and reason. This gnoseology leaves aside any possibility of establishing a sensible, corporeal link between the subject that knows and the known object. Res extensa/res cogitans: with this famous dichotomy, Descartes enthrones the philosophical dualism that illuminates the whole history of western philosophy, from the myth of Plato's cave to the emergence from immanence by Husserl's intentionality. My paper tells the story of this deep-rooted desire to objectify knowledge, making it independent from the subject. This is what reflects the sacrifice of imagination.
Ricardo Mandolini PhD
ARISTOTE, (1989). De l’âme (on the Soul) III, 427 b., Text prepared by A. Jannone on translation to French and notes by E. Jannone Barbotin, Gallimard.
BOUCHARD, (2004). Yves, L’holisme épistémologique de Kant (The epistemological holism by Kant), Bellarmin/Vrin, Montréal/Paris.
CASTORIADIS, (1975). Cornelius, L’institution imaginaire de la société, (The imaginary institution of society) éditions du Seuil, p. 467.
CORBIN, Henri, (1979). Corps spirituel et terre céleste, de l’Iran mazdéen à l’Iran Shî’ite (Spiritual body and celestial Earth : from Mazdean Iran to Shiʻite Iran), Éditions Buchel/Chastel, Paris.
EMMANUEL, Pierre, (1971). Pour une politique de la culture, Éditions du Seuil, Paris.